Appearing for ArcelorMittal, senior advocate Harish Salve and A M Singhvi argued that the company had not set up UG or KSSP but had made commercial investments in them and had divested its shares much before bidding for Essar Steel, which allegedly defaulted on huge bank loans, part of which were obtained on personal guarantees of Essar promoters Ravi Ruia and Prashant Ruia to SBI. On a petition by SBI, the SC had recently ruled that banks could proceed against the personal guarantor for corporate loan defaults. Read more…
officesinghvi
September 13, 2018 in
Print Media
Related Posts
Swamy moves HC for status report in AirAsia case
July 17, 2018
Cong: Govt not acting against ‘tainted’ CVC
January 30, 2019
My Press Brief dated 21.05.2017 at Jalandhar
May 21, 2017
