‘Prejudice to Mistrys enough reason for court intervention’

In one of the hearings, Tata counsel Abhishek Singhvi had said that Tata Trusts, with its 66% shareholding in Tata Sons, reserved the right to remove the board of directors of the company and that the veto rights are nothing to complain about. Taking on Singhvi’s statements, Sundaram said that the argument itself demonstrates how Singhvi’s clients have given instructions to take pride in their unfairness — which alone shows the predilection to indulging in unfair conduct against the Mistrys.know more

Related Posts

Leave a reply